Acoustic echo cancellation (aec) rate adaptation

ABSTRACT

Step size can be used to slow or freeze the adaptive filter to improve AEC system performance, such as during double talk events. An AEC control system may be used to adjust the step size based on an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio (EDER). The algorithm adjusts the step size to lower the adaptation rate when the EDER is small (or the combination of the near signal and noise is large compared to the echo) and raise the adaptation rate when the EDER is large (echo is large compared to a combination of near signal and noise).

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The instant disclosure relates to audio processing. More specifically,portions of this disclosure relate to acoustic echo cancellation (AEC).

BACKGROUND

Wireless telephones, such as mobile/cellular telephones and cordlesstelephones, and other consumer audio devices, such as mp3 players, arein widespread use. Performance of such devices with respect to audiointelligibility can be improved by providing noise canceling using amicrophone. In noise cancellation, the microphone measures ambientacoustic events and then inserts an anti-noise signal into the output ofthe device to cancel the ambient acoustic events measured by themicrophone. The acoustic environment around personal audio devices canchange dramatically, depending on the sources of noise that are presentand the position of the device itself. An adaptive noise cancellation(ANC) system may be employed to adapt the noise canceling to take intoaccount environmental changes. However, some drawbacks are associatedwith conventional ANC systems.

A conventional AEC system is illustrated in FIG. 1. An AEC system 112 ina device receives input from a microphone, which receives noise, speech,and echoes from each active speaker of the device. The AEC system 112also receives input signals corresponding to the audio signal drivingthe active speakers, which are correlated with the echoes received bythe microphone. The AEC system 112 uses the input speaker signals toremove echoes from the input microphone signal to generate an outputaudio signal. An adaptive filter is controlled through filtercoefficients to decouple the far-end signal of the speakers from anear-end signal of the microphone.

The presence of signals in the input microphone other than the far-endspeaker signal inhibits operation of the adaptive filter. For example,the presence of both a near-end talker and a far-end talker can disruptadaptation of the filter. Conventionally, a detector of near-end speech,called a double-talk detector (DTD), is used to control the AEC toprevent this disruption. A DTD 114 is coupled to the AEC system 112 toprovide an adapt enable signal. When the DTD 114 detects thisdouble-talker scenario, the DTD 114 instructions the AEC system 112 tostop adaptation of the filter. This halting of adaptation prevents thefilter from diverging. However, DTDs present several problems. DTDs areoften unreliable in correctly detecting a double talker scenario.Additionally, DTDs only offer a binary control to turn on or off theadaptation of the filter based on whether double talk is present or not.Furthermore, DTDs do not detect near-end noise, which can also cause theAEC to diverge.

Shortcomings mentioned here are only representative and are includedsimply to highlight that a need exists for improved electricalcomponents, particularly for acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) systemsemployed in consumer-level devices, such as mobile phones. Embodimentsdescribed herein address certain shortcomings but not necessarily eachand every one described here or known in the art. Furthermore,embodiments described herein may present other benefits than, and beused in other applications than, those of the shortcomings describedabove.

SUMMARY

Step size can be controlled to slow or freeze the adaptive filter toimprove AEC system performance by preventing divergence during doubletalk events. An AEC control system may be used to adjust the step sizebased on an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio (EDER). The algorithmadjusts the step size to lower the adaptation rate when the EDER issmall (or the combination of the near signal and noise is large comparedto the echo) and raise the adaptation rate when the EDER is large (echois large compared to a combination of near signal and noise).

A convergence detector may be used to adjust an operating mode of theAEC system and change how the algorithm adjusts the step size of the AECsystem. The AEC system may have two modes of operation, acquisition modeand maintenance mode. The AEC is in acquisition mode when the adaptivefilter is not converged. During this time, the control algorithm is notused and the step size of the adaptation process may be constant. Whenthe AEC is converged, the adaptive filter may be operated in amaintenance mode, and the control algorithm may automatically adjust theadaptation rate in relation to the EDER. The maintenance mode allows theAEC to continuously adapt during double talk and other noise withoutsignificant divergence, and to re-adapt quickly after a path change.

One embodiment of an AEC system according to aspects of this disclosureincludes an adaptive filter configured to modify an input microphonesignal based on a plurality of filter coefficients to obtain anecho-cancelled output signal; and a step size controller coupled to theadaptive filter and configured to adjust an adaptation rate of theadaptive filter based on an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio metric,computed from the input microphone signal, the echo-cancelled outputsignal, and a desired Echo Return Loss Enhancement (ERLE). The ERLEvalue is representative of an amount of echo cancellation desired fromthe AEC or other echo cancelling block, and may be referred to as anecho suppression ratio or echo reduction level. The step size controllermay be configured to adjust the step size by decreasing or increasingthe step size in relation the echo-to-disturbance energy ratio metric.In some embodiments, the AEC system may include a convergence detectorcoupled to the adaptive filter and coupled to the step size controller,wherein the step size controller is configured to disable adjusting ofthe adaptation rate of the adaptive filter when the convergence detectordetermines the adaptive filter is not converged. The convergencedetector may be coupled to outputs of a plurality of filter taps of theadaptive filter, and wherein the convergence detector determines theadaptive filter is not converged by comparing a ratio of outputs from afirst set of the plurality of filter taps with outputs from a second setof the plurality of filter taps of the adaptive filter

Electronic devices incorporating the AEC system described above maybenefit from improved audio processing such as through clearer telephonecalls and voice recordings, and improved ASR (automatic speechrecognition) performance. The electronic devices may include ananalog-to-digital converter (ADC). The ADC may be used to convert ananalog signal, such as an audio signal from a microphone, to a digitalrepresentation of the analog signal. The AEC system and componentsimplementing aspects of the described AEC system may be used inelectronic devices with audio capability, such as music players, CDplayers, DVD players, Blu-ray players, headphones, portable speakers,headsets, mobile phones, tablet computers, personal computers, set-topboxes, digital video recorder (DVR) boxes, home theatre receivers,infotainment systems, automobile audio systems, and the like.

The foregoing has outlined rather broadly certain features and technicaladvantages of embodiments of the present invention in order that thedetailed description that follows may be better understood. Additionalfeatures and advantages will be described hereinafter that form thesubject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated bythose having ordinary skill in the art that the conception and specificembodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying ordesigning other structures for carrying out the same or similarpurposes. It should also be realized by those having ordinary skill inthe art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spiritand scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.Additional features will be better understood from the followingdescription when considered in connection with the accompanying figures.It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures isprovided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is notintended to limit the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the disclosed system and methods,reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunctionwith the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a conventional acoustic echocancellation (AEC) system with double-talk detection.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an example method for controllingadaptation of a filter of an acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) systembased on an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio and desired ERLE accordingto some embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an acoustic echo cancellation(AEC) system with ESNR-based variable step size (EVSS) control accordingto some embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating step size adjustments in an acoustic echocancellation (AEC) system with ESNR-based variable step size (EVSS)control in response to barge-in talkers according to some embodiments ofthe disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating an example method for controllingadaptation of a filter of an acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) systembased on an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio and filter convergencestate according to some embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an acoustic echo cancellation(AEC) system with ESNR-based variable step size (EVSS) control and aconvergence detector according to some embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 7 is an illustration showing an example personal media device withan acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) system with ESNR-based variable stepsize (EVSS) control according to one embodiment of the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an example method for controllingadaptation of a filter of an acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) systembased on an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio according to someembodiments of the disclosure. A method 200 begins at block 202 withgenerating an echo-cancelled output signal based on a microphone inputsignal using an adaptive filter. The echo-cancelled output signal is anoutput of the AEC system and includes the desired speech from themicrophone signal. The echo-cancelled output signal is obtained byprocessing the input microphone signal through an adaptive filteroperating based on filter coefficients. The adaptive filter changes overtime based on the echo-cancelled output signal. The rate of change ofcoefficients of the adaptive filter in response to the echo-cancelledoutput signal can be controlled by a step size parameter. At block 204,an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio (EDER) may be determined based onthe echo-cancelled output signal, such as by comparing theecho-cancelled output signal to the microphone input signal. Thedetermination at block 204 may be performed without a dedicatedmicrophone that provides the disturbance signal. At block 206, the stepsize of the adaptive filter is adjusted based on the EDER determined atblock 204.

A block diagram for an AEC system implementing the processing describedin FIG. 2 is shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating anacoustic echo cancellation (AEC) system with ESNR-based variable stepsize (EVSS) control according to some embodiments of the disclosure. AnAEC system 300 includes an AEC processing block 312, which may includean adaptive filter. The processing block 312 may receive signals fromthe microphone 302 and speakers 304. The adaptive filter of theprocessing block 312 adjusts filter coefficients to obtain anecho-cancelled output signal that removes unwanted signals. Theecho-cancelled output and the microphone signal are provided to EVSSprocessing block 314. Processing block 314 generates a step sizeadaptation rate signal for controlling the AEC processing block 312. Theadaptation rate signal is used to adjust a rate of adaptation of thefilter in AEC processing block 312, such as updating a step size forevolution of the filter coefficients in response to the echo-cancelledoutput signal.

The adjustment of the step size for the adaptive filter may be based onthe echo-to-disturbance energy ratio (EDER) and a desired echo reductionlevel (ERLE). The processing block 314 may adjust the step size to lowerthe adaptation rate when the EDER is low and raise the adaptation ratewhen the EDER is large. For example, the processing block 314 may slowor halt the adaptation rate when a barge-in talker creates a double-talkevent during operation of the AEC processing block 312. An exampleoperation of the AEC system 300 is shown in FIG. 4. FIG. 4 is a graphillustrating step size adjustments in an acoustic echo cancellation(AEC) system with ESNR-based variable step size (EVSS) control inresponse to barge-in talkers according to some embodiments of thedisclosure. The graph illustrates step size for the adaptive filter as afunction of frequency over time processing an input signal. A barge-intalker appears in the input microphone signal at times 402, 404, and406. The barge-in talker changes the EDER of the echo-cancelled outputsignal and the EVSS processing block 314 responds by decreasing theadaptation rate of the filter at each of times 402, 404, and 406. Thatdecrease in step size is shown by the decrease in adaptation rate atvalues across all frequencies at times 402, 404, and 406. The decreasein adaptation rate slows the adaptation to prevent divergence of theadaptive filter because of the barge-in talker.

In one embodiment, an adapted step size μ_(EVSS) determined by the EVSSprocessing block 414 may be given by

${\mu_{EVSS}(t)} = {\frac{\mu}{1 + \frac{R}{{esnr}(t)}}.}$

where parameter R is related to the desired echo reduction level (ERLE).The R parameter may be a factor that optimizes the tradeoff betweenconvergence speed and convergence depth. Convergence depth refers torefer to the closeness of the solution achieved to an optimal solution(e.g., perfect echo cancellation). The step size μ_(EVSS) controls thespeed of convergence, but may be used to control the depth ofconvergence. A small step size will converge slowly, but more deeply. Alarge step size will converge faster but not as deep. A trade-off can bemade by adjusting R to an appropriate value. The variable step size ofthe AEC system may thus be optimized for a convergence depth (andconversely for a convergence speed) depending on the R parameter. The Rvalue may be determined heuristically and pre-programmed into the AECsystem (one possible value for R is 41), and esnr(t) may be determinedfrom following equation:

${{{esnr}(t)} = \frac{P_{in} - P_{out}}{P_{out}}},{where}$${P_{in}(n)} = {{\lambda \; {P_{in}\left( {n - 1} \right)}} + {\left( {1 - \lambda} \right){\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{numTaps}\; {d^{2}\left( {n,k} \right)}}}}$and${{P_{out}(n)} = {{\lambda \; {P_{out}\left( {n - 1} \right)}} + {\left( {1 - \lambda} \right){\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{numTaps}\; {e^{2}\left( {n,k} \right)}}}}},$

where values for the λ may be determined heuristically andpre-programmed into the AEC system (one possible value for λ is 0.9). Bycombining these equations, the step size calculation can be written as:

$\mu_{EVSS} = {\frac{\mu \left( {P_{in} - P_{out}} \right)}{P_{in} + {\left( {R - 1} \right)P_{out}}}.}$

A convergence detector may also be used to control an adaptation rate ofthe AEC system. A method for adapting a filter based on convergencedetection is shown in FIG. 5. FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating anexample method for controlling adaptation of a filter of an acousticecho cancellation (AEC) system based on an echo-to-disturbance energyratio and filter convergence state according to some embodiments of thedisclosure. A method 500 begins at block 502 with generating anecho-cancelled output signal based on a microphone input signal using anadaptive filter, similar to block 202 of FIG. 2. At block 504, aconvergence state is determined for the adaptive filter. At block 506,it is determined whether the adaptive filter is sufficiently converged.If not, the step size for the adaptive filter may be set to apredetermined level. If the adaptive filter is converged, then themethod 500 proceeds to block 510 to determine an echo-to-disturbanceenergy ratio (EDER) based on the echo-cancelled output signal generatedat block 502. At block 512, the step size is calculated from the EDERestimation and the desired ERLE.

A block diagram for an AEC system implementing the processing describedin FIG. 5 is shown in FIG. 6. FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating anacoustic echo cancellation (AEC) system with ESNR-based variable stepsize (EVSS) control and a convergence detector according to someembodiments of the disclosure. An AEC system 600 includes an AECprocessing block 612, similar to block 412 of FIG. 4. An EVSS processingblock 614 provides an adapt rate signal to the AEC processing block 612.The EVSS processing block 614 may control the AEC processing block 612based on an echo-to-disturbance energy ratio (EDER) determined from theinput microphone signal and the echo-cancelled output signal. Theprocessing block 614 may also control the AEC processing block 612 basedon a signal from a convergence detector 616. The detector 616 receivesoutputs from a plurality of taps of the adaptive filter in the AECprocessing block 612. The detector 616 may output an enable signal tothe EVSS processing block 614 based on the convergence state of theadaptive filter. When the adaptive filter is not converged, the processof updating the adaptation rate using the EVSS processing block 614 maybe disabled.

The convergence detector 616 may determine if the adaptive filter issufficiently converged by measuring a flatness of the ratio of a secondhalf of an estimated impulse response to a first half of the impulseresponse. The ratio may be calculated as:

${{{ratio}\mspace{14mu} (n)} = {{\lambda \; {ratio}\mspace{14mu} \left( {n - 1} \right)} + {\left( {1 - \lambda} \right)\frac{\sum\limits_{k = {K\text{/}2}}^{K - 1}\; {h^{2}(k)}}{\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{{K\text{/}2} - 1}\; {h^{2}(k)}}}}},$

where h is the impulse response and K is the number of taps of theadaptive filter.

An AEC system with an adjustable rate based on the echo-to-disturbanceenergy ratio reduces undesirable divergence of the adaptive filter inresponse to events such as barge-in talkers. In one embodiment of suchan AEC system, a false rejection rate (FFR) of 10% was measured at anSNR of 7 dB for the system without barge-in and an FFR of 10% wasachieved at −19 dB for the barge-in algorithm, which is an improvementof 26 dB.

One advantageous embodiment for an audio processor described herein is amobile device configured for recording audio, making telephone calls,video chatting, and/or other activities involving processing microphoneinput. FIG. 7 is an illustration showing an example mobile device foraudio playback including an audio controller that is configured toreduce distortion in reproduced audio according to one embodiment of thedisclosure. A mobile device 700 may include a display 702 for allowing auser to select a contact to dial. Speech received from a telephone callor video call is provided to an audio controller 706. The audiocontroller 706 may include an acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) system706A. The acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) system 706A may implementaudio processing to modify an input audio signal, such as according tothe embodiments of FIG. 2, FIG. 3, FIG. 4, FIG. 5, or FIG. 6. The echocancellation of system 706A may be useful, for example, duringspeakerphone calls involving speaker 712. Other data received at theaudio controller 706 may be as received from sources such as a USBconnection, Wi-Fi, cellular radio, another wireless radio, and/or awired connection. The output of the audio controller 706, such as anecho-cancelled output signal, may be provided to an applicationprocessor (AP) 710 of the mobile device 700 for further processing, suchas transmission of speech for a telephone call or recording of thespeech for later playback. The output of the audio controller 706 may beconfigured as an analog or a digital signal through the use of anappropriate converter.

The operations described above as performed by a controller may beperformed by any circuit configured to perform the described operations.Such a circuit may be an integrated circuit (IC) constructed on asemiconductor substrate and include logic circuitry, such as transistorsconfigured as logic gates, and memory circuitry, such as transistors andcapacitors configured as dynamic random access memory (DRAM),electronically programmable read-only memory (EPROM), or other memorydevices. The logic circuitry may be configured through hard-wireconnections or through programming by instructions contained infirmware. Further, the logic circuitry may be configured as ageneral-purpose processor (e.g., CPU or DSP) capable of executinginstructions contained in software. The firmware and/or software mayinclude instructions that cause the processing of signals describedherein to be performed. The circuitry or software may be organized asblocks that are configured to perform specific functions. Alternatively,some circuitry or software may be organized as shared blocks that canperform several of the described operations. In some embodiments, theintegrated circuit (IC) that is the controller may include otherfunctionality. For example, the controller IC may include an audiocoder/decoder (CODEC) along with circuitry for performing the functionsdescribed herein. Such an IC is one example of an audio controller.Other audio functionality may be additionally or alternativelyintegrated with the IC circuitry described herein to form an audiocontroller.

If implemented in firmware and/or software, functions described abovemay be stored as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readablemedium. Examples include non-transitory computer-readable media encodedwith a data structure and computer-readable media encoded with acomputer program. Computer-readable media includes physical computerstorage media. A storage medium may be any available medium that can beaccessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, suchcomputer-readable media can comprise random access memory (RAM),read-only memory (ROM), electrically-erasable programmable read-onlymemory (EEPROM), compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other opticaldisk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices,or any other medium that can be used to store desired program code inthe form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed bya computer. Disk and disc includes compact discs (CD), laser discs,optical discs, digital versatile discs (DVD), floppy disks and Blu-raydiscs. Generally, disks reproduce data magnetically, and discs reproducedata optically. Combinations of the above should also be included withinthe scope of computer-readable media.

In addition to storage on computer readable medium, instructions and/ordata may be provided as signals on transmission media included in acommunication apparatus. For example, a communication apparatus mayinclude a transceiver having signals indicative of instructions anddata. The instructions and data are configured to cause one or moreprocessors to implement the functions outlined in the claims.

The described methods are generally set forth in a logical flow ofsteps. As such, the described order and labeled steps of representativefigures are indicative of aspects of the disclosed method. Other stepsand methods may be conceived that are equivalent in function, logic, oreffect to one or more steps, or portions thereof, of the illustratedmethod. Additionally, the format and symbols employed are provided toexplain the logical steps of the method and are understood not to limitthe scope of the method. Although various arrow types and line types maybe employed in the flow chart diagram, they are understood not to limitthe scope of the corresponding method. Indeed, some arrows or otherconnectors may be used to indicate only the logical flow of the method.For instance, an arrow may indicate a waiting or monitoring period ofunspecified duration between enumerated steps of the depicted method.Additionally, the order in which a particular method occurs may or maynot strictly adhere to the order of the corresponding steps shown.

Although the present disclosure and certain representative advantageshave been described in detail, it should be understood that variouschanges, substitutions and alterations can be made herein withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by theappended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is notintended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process,machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and stepsdescribed in the specification. For example, where processing steps aredescribed as implemented on certain circuitry such as digital signalprocessors (DSPs), the processing may be executed by other types ofprocessors, such as graphics processing units (GPUs) and centralprocessing units (CPUs). As one of ordinary skill in the art willreadily appreciate from the present disclosure, processes, machines,manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presentlyexisting or later to be developed that perform substantially the samefunction or achieve substantially the same result as the correspondingembodiments described herein may be utilized. Accordingly, the appendedclaims are intended to include within their scope such processes,machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for echo cancellation in an audio systemhaving a transducer and a microphone, comprising: generating anecho-cancelled output signal from a microphone input signal and atransducer output signal, wherein the echo-cancelled output signal isgenerated using an adaptive filter; determining an echo-to-disturbanceenergy ratio by comparing an energy of the microphone input signal andan energy of the echo-cancelled output signal; and adjusting a step sizeof the adaptive filter used to converge on the echo-cancelled outputsignal based, at least in part, on the echo-to-disturbance energy ratio.2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: detecting convergence ofthe adaptive filter; and performing the step of adjusting the step sizebased on a convergence state of the adaptive filter.
 3. The method ofclaim 2, wherein the step of detecting convergence of the adaptivefilter comprises comparing a ratio of outputs from a first set of filtertaps of the adaptive filter with outputs from a second set of filtertaps of the adaptive filter.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the stepof detecting convergence of the adaptive filter comprises determining aflatness of the ratio.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step ofdetermining the echo-to-disturbance energy ratio comprises: determiningan energy of the microphone input signal; and determining an energy ofthe echo-cancelled output signal.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein thestep of adjusting the step size is based, at least in part, on a desiredecho reduction level.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step ofgenerating the echo-cancelled output signal is performed withoutdouble-talk detection.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the step ofadjusting the step size comprises adjusting the step size in proportionto the echo-to-disturbance energy ratio.
 9. An apparatus, comprising: anaudio controller configured to perform steps comprising: generating anecho-cancelled output signal from a microphone input signal and atransducer output signal, wherein the echo-cancelled output signal isgenerated using an adaptive filter; determining an echo-to-disturbanceenergy ratio by comparing an energy of the microphone input signal andan energy of the echo-cancelled output signal; and adjusting a step sizeof the adaptive filter used to converge on the echo-cancelled outputsignal based, at least in part, on the echo-to-disturbance energy ratio.10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the audio controller is furtherconfigured to perform steps comprising: detecting convergence of theadaptive filter; and performing the step of adjusting the step sizebased on a convergence state of the adaptive filter.
 11. The apparatusof claim 10, wherein the audio controller is configured to detectconvergence of the adaptive filter by comparing a ratio of outputs froma first set of filter taps of the adaptive filter with outputs from asecond set of filter taps of the adaptive filter.
 12. The apparatus ofclaim 11, wherein the audio controller is configured to detectconvergence of the adaptive filter by determining a flatness of theratio.
 13. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the audio controller isconfigured to determine the echo-to-disturbance energy ratio by:determining an energy of the microphone input signal; and determining anenergy of the echo-cancelled output signal.
 14. The apparatus of claim9, wherein the audio controller is configured to adjust the step size isbased, at least in part, on a desired echo reduction level.
 15. Theapparatus of claim 9, wherein the audio controller is configured togenerate the echo-cancelled output signal without a double-talkdetector.
 16. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the audio controller isconfigured to adjust the step size by adjusting the step size inproportion to the echo-to-disturbance energy ratio.
 17. An acoustic echocancellation (AEC) system, comprising: an adaptive filter configured tomodify an input microphone signal based on a plurality of filtercoefficients to obtain an echo-cancelled output signal; a step sizecontroller coupled to the adaptive filter and configured to adjust anadaptation rate of the adaptive filter based, at least in part, on anecho-to-disturbance energy ratio computed from the input microphonesignal, the echo-cancelled output signal, and a desired echo reductionlevel.
 18. The acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) system of claim 17,wherein the step size controller is configured to adjust the step sizeby adjusting the step size in proportion to the echo-to-disturbanceenergy ratio.
 19. The acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) system of claim17, further comprising a convergence detector coupled to the adaptivefilter and coupled to the step size controller, wherein the step sizecontroller is configured to disable adjusting of the adaptation rate ofthe adaptive filter when the convergence detector determines theadaptive filter is not converged.
 20. The acoustic echo cancellation(AEC) system of claim 19, wherein the convergence detector is coupled tooutputs of a plurality of filter taps of the adaptive filter, andwherein the convergence detector determines the adaptive filter is notconverged by comparing a ratio of outputs from a first set of theplurality of filter taps with outputs from a second set of the pluralityof filter taps of the adaptive filter.